

- VISUAL COMPOSER SAVE AS ELEMENT UPGRADE
- VISUAL COMPOSER SAVE AS ELEMENT PLUS
- VISUAL COMPOSER SAVE AS ELEMENT FREE
There’s also a free Lite version of Beaver Builder available. Through the front-end point-and-click user interface, you can customize these templates or create your own page designs from scratch. This tool includes a good selection of page templates to help you get started. Official website Beaver Builder (A Brief Introduction)īeaver Builder is an extremely well-respected drag-and-drop page builder plugin for WordPress. However, in this page builder comparison, we’ll explore how easy Visual Composer is to use and how well it stacks up to the competition. We’ve already looked at what Visual Composer is capable of in a previous post. Visual Composer is the most affordable option here, and it boasts an impressive feature set. It’s been bundled into countless WordPress themes, adding drag-and-drop functionality to their feature lists. Visual Composer is perhaps the most well-known page builder plugin for WordPress. But before we get to the comparison, here’s a quick introduction to each of the plugins.

The Best WordPress Page Builder PluginsĪs mentioned, we’ll be comparing the top three page builder plugins: Visual Composer, Beaver Builder and Thrive Content Builder. These are just a couple of the issues we’ll be looking at in this comparison. WordPress page builder plugins do have their drawbacks: Some can be difficult to use with less-than-intuitive user interfaces some can cause problems should you wish to change page builder tools in the future. If you’ve ever wished you had more control over the appearance of your WordPress website’s content, then a page builder plugin could be just what you’re looking for. Furthermore, the best WordPress page builders have user-friendly interfaces that aim to simplify the process of creating advanced page designs. Modules such as buttons, sliders, and media players can be used to help you build feature-rich content for your site. The most powerful page builder tools - such as the ones we’re comparing here - also give you the ability to insert useful modules or elements into your layouts. Fonts, colors, and dimensions are just some of the properties of your layouts that you can control. Typically, rows and columns are used to produce these creative page layouts, and the appearance and styling of the layouts can then be customized in many ways.

Thanks to their drag-and-drop user interfaces, the best page builder tools make it easy to construct advanced layouts for your content. A page builder provides an alternative to the default WordPress Editor, allowing you to create more sophisticated designs for your website’s posts, pages, and other content.
VISUAL COMPOSER SAVE AS ELEMENT UPGRADE
What Is a WordPress Page Builder?Ī page builder usually comes in the form of a plugin - something you can activate on your WordPress website to enhance its functionality - and its main purpose is to upgrade the WordPress content editing experience.
VISUAL COMPOSER SAVE AS ELEMENT PLUS
We’ll be looking at their user interfaces, the various prebuilt layouts and templates they offer, their modules and elements (more on what these actually are below), what happens if/when you deactivate them, and the overall user-experiences each provides - plus quite a bit more to boot!īy the end of this article, you should have all the information you need to help you decide which of these three options best suits your needs.īefore we get to the real meat of the comparison, however, let’s take a quick look at what a page builder is, how it works, and what it can do for your website. This article talks about the old version of Visual Composer, which, again (and very confusingly), and is now called “WPBakery Page Builder”), Beaver Builder, and Thrive Content Builder. In this article, we’ll be comparing three of the best WordPress page builder plugins: Visual Composer (recently renamed to “ WPBakery Page Builder for WordPress” – note: there is now an entirely new version of “Visual Composer”, available here, which is NOT the version being covered in this article.
